If I Exist Now Why Cant I Exist Again?
What existed earlier the Big Bang?
How our Universe was born from nothing or if there was something that existed earlier it remains a mystery, only that is not stopping some physicists from trying to figure it out.
My understanding is that nothing comes from nothing. For something to exist, at that place must be textile or a component bachelor, and for them to be available, there must be something else available. Where did the material come from that created the Big Blindside, and what happened in the outset instance to create that textile? – Peter, 80, Australia.
"The last star will slowly cool and fade away. With its passing, the Universe will get once more a void, without calorie-free or life or meaning." So warned the physicist Brian Cox in the recent BBC series Universe.
The fading of that last star will only exist the offset of an infinitely long, dark epoch. All matter volition eventually be consumed by monstrous black holes, which in their turn will evaporate abroad into the dimmest glimmers of calorie-free. Space will expand always outwards until even that dim light becomes too spread out to interact. Activity will cease.
Or will information technology? Strangely enough, some cosmologists believe a previous, common cold dark empty universe like the one which lies in our far futurity could accept been the source of our very own Big Bang.
The first matter
Only before we get to that, let's accept a await at how "textile" – physical affair – start came nigh. If nosotros are aiming to explain the origins of stable matter fabricated of atoms or molecules, there was certainly none of that around at the Big Blindside, nor for hundreds of thousands of years afterwards. Nosotros do, in fact, take a pretty detailed understanding of how the first atoms formed out of simpler particles, once conditions cooled down enough for circuitous matter to be stable, and how these atoms were later fused into heavier elements inside stars. But that understanding doesn't address the question of whether something came from nix.
Then permit'southward remember further back. The starting time long-lived matter particles of whatever kind were protons and neutrons, which together brand upwards the atomic nucleus. These came into existence around i ten-thousandth of a second later on the Big Bang. Before that betoken, there was really no material in whatsoever familiar sense of the word. Simply physics lets us proceed on tracing the timeline backwards – to physical processes which predate whatever stable affair.
This takes us to the and then-called "grand unified epoch". Past now, we are well into the realm of speculative physics, as we tin't produce enough free energy in our experiments to probe the sort of processes that were going on at the time. Merely a plausible hypothesis is that the physical world was made up of a soup of short-lived elementary particles, including quarks, the building blocks of protons and neutrons. In that location was both thing and "antimatter" in roughly equal quantities. Each type of matter particle, such as the quark, has an antimatter "mirror epitome" companion, which is near identical to itself, differing only in 1 aspect. Yet, thing and antimatter demolish in a flash of energy when they meet, meaning these particles were constantly created and destroyed.
In the first moments afterwards the Large Bang, the Universe was a hot soup of particles where infinite and time was still to properly emerge (Credit: Science History Images/Alamy)
But how did these particles come up to exist in the offset identify? Quantum field theory tells united states that even a vacuum, supposedly corresponding to empty spacetime, is full of concrete action in the form of energy fluctuations. These fluctuations tin give rise to particles popping out, only to disappear soon after. This may audio like a mathematical quirk rather than existent physics, but such particles have been spotted in countless experiments.
The spacetime vacuum land is seething with particles constantly being created and destroyed, manifestly "out of nothing". But perhaps all this actually tells u.s.a. is that the breakthrough vacuum is (despite its name) a something rather than a nothing. The philosopher David Albert has memorably criticised accounts of the Big Bang which promise to go something from nothing in this way.
Suppose we ask: where did spacetime itself arise from? Then nosotros tin can keep turning the clock yet farther back, into the truly ancient "Planck epoch" – a menstruum so early in the Universe'southward history that our best theories of physics break down. This era occurred only i 10-millionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second afterward the Large Bang. At this point, space and time themselves became subject area to quantum fluctuations. Physicists ordinarily work separately with quantum mechanics, which rules the microworld of particles, and with general relativity, which applies on large, catholic scales. But to truly understand the Planck epoch, we need a complete theory of quantum gravity, merging the 2.
We however don't take a perfect theory of quantum gravity, just there are attempts – like cord theory and loop quantum gravity. In these attempts, ordinary space and fourth dimension are typically seen equally emergent, similar the waves on the surface of a deep ocean. What we experience as space and time are the product of quantum processes operating at a deeper, microscopic level – processes that don't make much sense to united states of america as creatures rooted in the macroscopic world.
In the Planck epoch, our ordinary understanding of infinite and time breaks down, so nosotros can't whatsoever longer rely on our ordinary understanding of cause and event either. Despite this, all candidate theories of quantum gravity describe something physical that was going on in the Planck epoch – some breakthrough forerunner of ordinary space and time. Simply where didthat come from?
Life's Large Questions
This article is part of Life'due south Big Questions, a new series by The Conversation that is being co-published with BBC Time to come. It seeks to answer our readers' nagging questions about life, love, expiry and the Universe. We work with professional person researchers who have dedicated their lives to uncovering new perspectives on the questions that shape our lives. If y'all have a question you would similar to exist answered, please email either send the states a message on Facebook or Twitter or email bigquestions@theconversation.com
Even if causality no longer applies in any ordinary way, it might still be possible to explain one component of the Planck-epoch universe in terms of another. Unfortunately, by now fifty-fifty our best physics fails completely to provide answers. Until we make further progress towards a "theory of everything", nosotros won't be able to give whatsoever definitive answer. The almost nosotros tin say with confidence at this stage is that physics has then far establish no confirmed instances of something arising from nothing.
Cycles from virtually nothing
To truly answer the question of how something could arise from nothing, we would need to explain the breakthrough land of the entire Universe at the offset of the Planck epoch. All attempts to do this remain highly speculative. Some of them appeal to supernatural forces like a designer. But other candidate explanations remain inside the realm of physics – such as a multiverse, which contains an infinite number of parallel universes, or cyclical models of the Universe, existence born and reborn once more.
The 2020 Nobel Prize-winning physicist Roger Penrose proposed one intriguing just controversial model for a cyclical universe dubbed "conformal cyclic cosmology". Penrose was inspired by an interesting mathematical connection between a very hot, dense, minor state of the Universe – as it was at the Big Bang – and an extremely cold, empty, expanded state of the Universe – as it volition be in the far futurity. His radical theory to explain this correspondence is that those states go mathematically identical when taken to their limits. Paradoxical though it might seem, a total absence of affair might have managed to give rise to all the affair we see around us in our Universe.
In this view, the Big Bang arises from an almost goose egg. That's what's left over when all the matter in a universe has been consumed into black holes, which take in turn boiled away into photons – lost in a void. The whole universe thus arises from something that – viewed from some other physical perspective – is as shut as i tin become to null at all. Just that nothing is still a kind of something. It is even so a physical universe, however empty.
Scientists at Cern have been trying to study antimatter in the promise of understanding more about the early on Universe (Credit: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty Images)
How can the very same state exist a cold, empty universe from one perspective and a hot dense universe from another? The answer lies in a circuitous mathematical process called "conformal rescaling", a geometrical transformation which in issue alters the size of an object but leaves its shape unchanged.
Penrose showed how the cold dumbo country and the hot dense state could be related past such rescaling so that they match with respect to the shapes of their spacetimes – although not to their sizes. Information technology is, admittedly, difficult to grasp how ii objects tin can be identical in this way when they have unlike sizes – only Penrose argues size as a concept ceases to make sense in such extreme concrete environments.
In conformal cyclic cosmology, the direction of explanation goes from old and common cold to immature and hot: the hot dense state exists because of the common cold empty country. Merely this "because" is not the familiar i – of a cause followed in time by its effect. It is not merely size that ceases to be relevant in these extreme states: time does too. The cold dumbo state and the hot dense state are in effect located on different timelines. The cold empty state would continue on forever from the perspective of an observer in its own temporal geometry, just the hot dense state it gives rise to effectively inhabits a new timeline all its own.
You might also like:
- What if the Universe has no finish?
- The weird physics inside blackness holes
- The mystery of how big our Universe really is
It may help to understand the hot dense state as produced from the cold empty state in some non-causal way. Perhaps nosotros should say that the hot dumbo state emerges from, or is grounded in, or realised by the common cold, empty land. These are distinctively metaphysical ideas which have been explored by philosophers of science extensively, especially in the context of quantum gravity, where ordinary cause and effect seem to pause down. At the limits of our knowledge, physics and philosophy go hard to disentangle.
Experimental evidence?
Conformal cyclic cosmology offers some detailed, admitting speculative, answers to the question of where our Big Bang came from. But even if Penrose's vision is vindicated by the future progress of cosmology, nosotros might think that we however wouldn't have answered a deeper philosophical question – a question about where physical reality itself came from. How did the whole system of cycles come up nearly?
Then we finally end up with the pure question of why at that place is something rather than nothing – 1 of the biggest questions of metaphysics.
Some theories suggest that earlier our own Universe existed there were others that winked in and out of existence in cycles (Credit: Alamy)
But our focus here is on explanations which remain within the realm of physics. There are three broad options to the deeper question of how the cycles began. It could have no concrete caption at all. Or at that place could be incessantly repeating cycles, each a universe in its own right, with the initial quantum state of each universe explained past some feature of the universe earlier. Or there could be one unmarried wheel, and one single repeating universe, with the first of that cycle explained by some feature of its own finish. The latter two approaches avoid the need for any uncaused events – and this gives them a distinctive appeal. Nothing would be left unexplained by physics.
Penrose envisages a sequence of endless new cycles for reasons partly linked to his own preferred estimation of quantum theory. In quantum mechanics, a physical system exists in a superposition of many different states at the same time, and only "picks one" randomly, when we measure information technology. For Penrose, each cycle involves random quantum events turning out a dissimilar style – meaning each cycle will differ from those earlier and after information technology. This is really good news for experimental physicists, because it might allow us to glimpse the quondam universe that gave ascension to ours through faint traces, or anomalies, in the leftover radiation from the Big Bang seen by the Planck satellite.
Penrose and his collaborators believe they may have spotted these traces already, attributing patterns in the Planck information to radiation from supermassive black holes in the previous universe. Nonetheless, their claimed observations have been challenged by other physicists and the jury remains out.
Countless new cycles are key to Penrose's own vision. But there is a natural mode to convert conformal cyclic cosmology from a multi-cycle to a ane-bicycle form. Then physical reality consists in a single cycling around through the Big Bang to a maximally empty state in the far hereafter – and and then around again to the very aforementioned Large Bang, giving rise to the very aforementioned universe all over once again.
This latter possibility is consistent with another interpretation of breakthrough mechanics, dubbed the many-worlds interpretation. The many-worlds estimation tells us that each time we measure a system that is in superposition, this measurement doesn't randomly select a land. Instead, the measurement event we come across is simply ane possibility – the i that plays out in our ain Universe. The other measurement results all play out in other universes in a multiverse, effectively cut off from our own. So, no affair how modest the chance of something occurring, if information technology has a non-zippo chance then it occurs in some quantum parallel earth. There are people just similar you out at that place in other worlds who accept won the lottery, or have been swept upward into the clouds by a freak typhoon, or take spontaneously ignited, or accept done all three simultaneously.
Some people believe such parallel universes may as well be appreciable in cosmological information, equally imprints caused by another universe colliding with ours.
Many-worlds quantum theory gives a new twist on conformal cyclic cosmology, though not 1 that Penrose agrees with. Our Large Bang might exist the rebirth of one single quantum multiverse, containing infinitely many different universes all occurring together. Everything possible happens – then it happens once again and again and over again.
An ancient myth
For a philosopher of science, Penrose's vision is fascinating. Information technology opens up new possibilities for explaining the Big Bang, taking our explanations beyond ordinary cause and effect. It is therefore a peachy test case for exploring the different ways physics can explain our world. It deserves more attention from philosophers.
For a lover of mythology, Penrose's vision is beautiful. In Penrose's preferred multi-bike form, it promises countless new worlds born from the ashes of their ancestors. In its one-cycle grade, it is a striking modern re-invocation of the ancient idea of the ouroboros, or earth-serpent. In Norse mythology, the serpent Jörmungandr is a child of Loki, a clever trickster, and the giant Angrboda. Jörmungandr consumes its ain tail, and the circle created sustains the remainder of the earth. But the ouroboros myth has been documented all over the earth – including as far back as ancient Egypt.
The ouroboros of the i circadian universe is regal indeed. Information technology contains inside its belly our own Universe, also every bit every ane of the weird and wonderful alternative possible universes allowed past quantum physics – and at the point where its caput meets its tail, it is completely empty yet as well coursing with free energy at temperatures of a hundred yard million billion trillion degrees Celsius.
Even Loki, the shapeshifter, would be impressed.
* Alastair Wilson is professor of philosophy at University of Birmingham
--
This article originally appeared on The Conversation, and is republished under a Creative Commons licence.
--
Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter or Instagram .
If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "The Essential Listing" – a handpicked pick of stories from BBC Future , Civilisation ,Worklife, Travel and Reel delivered to your inbox every Friday.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220105-what-existed-before-the-big-bang